Robert Williams, CEO of Certguard, the self-proclaimed “I hate braindumps” vigilante organisation has publicly defamed Ethan Banks on this website
http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28444
Mr Williams has claimed that Ethan has used Testkings to study for his Written Exam and as such Ethan should have his CCIE Status revoked. Now, anyone who has pursued CCIE, is in the process of CCIE, or has otherwise supported someone in their pursuit, knows how long and arduous the process is. Ethan has only said the content in these dumps is what the exam material is based on, not that he used it as his only study guide.
I reviewed some of the older TestKing material during my final review, although it wasn’t a major focus. The good news is that the TK stuff has a lot of the concepts you need to know. But if you’re looking for actual questions that will show up on the exam, I didn’t see that in any of the TK material I looked at.
Now… Can anyone see in this quote where Ethan advocates using this material? All he says are the concepts are there. Nothing more. If he only relied on Testking to study, as opposed to knowing the material, then he would not have been able to pass his written. I think that is pretty simple.
The beauty of CCIE is you cant pass it by dumping. I am sure we have seen vendors promoting their “real” labs… But can you memorise eight hours of typing? If one question about L3 changes, then that will ruin your whole topology! You must know the material… Simple as that.
I can understand the crusade that Certguard are undertaking, and what the deal with dumping for exams does. They even have a section where sites are combed to see if they promote dumps or not. Have a look and see what he thinks of my site! :) www.certguard.com However, I think the attack on Ethan is unjustified and is nothing more of an exercise to scapegoat a hard working individual and generate traffic/income/hits/interest in a site that people may not have known about before.
Now… on to EIGRP!